Newton's Law > How it relates to gravity? - whats the opposite of conceded
Newton's law for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If we can confirm that, then we develop to admit that if gravity is the force that pulls things together, there must be a force tries to break things?
In addition, a fraction very flash, very low gravity seconds, and this force is imposed, which caused the big bang. What do you think? The dynamics of this force is, in fact today in our expansion of the universe, once again, what is your opinion.
(Just out of curiosity in the majority opinion)
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Whats The Opposite Of Conceded Newton's Law > How It Relates To Gravity?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Ure really smart if uve this question, with no signs of science books ... the gravity pulls things together, there is another force in the neucleus of atoms in the molecules of substances, it tries to slide apart, ... when you come to a balance between the two of them a heavy weight like a star stops contracting
Do not Blink ... Emphasis in the heart can be very, very strongly that the force of gravity ... often moving ... I do not think it happened during the Big Bang Tho ..... CUS does not always matter not on the principle of gravity into the picture
I thought Einstein said that if one speaks of particles when colide.Such as when one billiard ball, the other one. Energy is transferred to another through their dynamics. I do not believe Newton's law is valid in all countries .. I think Rhode Iceland is one of them. Now I do not think that the severity of Utah. But they have the law of relativity. You are in relation to each. By the early exercise of several women. This means that befor you get married is to have a DNA test. Other scientists who are breaking the law, a relativity.Unless second cousin. Then you must marry someone from outside the state. Since the law of relativity, which probably is not in the DNA. RNA or cousins .. In any case, you will not be the first ...
First, the cosmology is a bit flawed. Gravity is a consequence of the decoupling of the forces is the result of the Big Bang. Gravity has nothing to do with the Big Bang or the "beginning" of the universe to do.
His first statement is a misinterpretation of Newton's third law. Newton's third law says that if affects 1 on the object 2 with a force F, the object 2 on the object, 1 Act with a force F in the opposite direction. This is represented by a glass on a table. Gravity pulls down the window (by weight) and the table looks in the upward direction (normal), following the Newton's third law.
Another example of Newton's third law: While driving on the beach between the symbols of an error on my windshield, it feels as force majeure, the fault or my car?
Answer: The forces are exactly the same error that you feel the same force that my car did not. Significantly lower mean mass error making it significantly accelerates the symbol of my windshield. My car, according to the same enormous EMSS is practically affected by this collision.
What right do you say that? cuz i know the first 1 is "an object at rest remains at rest if they are traded on a group of" true Datz, a Banq BIQ in the still confused on DAT 1 X
The normal force is the opposite of gravity.
Cosmic physics is complex and not fully understood.
Post a Comment